Date: Sat, 18 Jul 1998 06:50:51 +0100 From: Adrian Wontroba <aw1@stade.co.uk> To: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Majordomo [was Re: And it's back] Message-ID: <19980718065051.A25700@stade.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <199807172331.QAA15220@hub.freebsd.org>; from Jonathan M. Bresler on Fri, Jul 17, 1998 at 04:31:23PM -0700 References: <19980717225920.A1388@stade.co.uk> <199807172331.QAA15220@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 17, 1998 at 04:31:23PM -0700, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote: > wow! please be careful here. i read "aliases files" and > nearly filled my shorts! i dont see how /etc/aliases > could have been affected....majordomo doesnt have root. Sorry - very poor choice of words. > so your list file (or subscribers file) got toasted. > hmm.... Yes. > which version of majordomo? 1.94 (quite old). I seem to recall having seen similar problems with even older majordomos run under SCO Open Server. > are you grouping addresses, say 10 per outbound email, or > are you sending 1 message per address and creating a sendmail > process for each? Grouped - with one outbound mail for the entire list. None of the lists are large. -- Adrian Wontroba, Stade Computers Limited. phone: (+44) 121 681 6677 Mail info@accu.org for information about the Association of C and C++ Users or see <http://www.accu.org/>; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980718065051.A25700>