Date: Sat, 22 Aug 1998 06:31:26 +0400 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick Makefile ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick/files md5 ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick/patches patch-aa ports/graphics/p5-PerlMagick/pkg COMMENT DESCR PLIST Message-ID: <19980822063125.A6226@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <199808220129.SAA13381@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from asami@FreeBSD.ORG on Fri, Aug 21, 1998 at 06:29:04PM -0700 References: <19980821171809.A29371@nagual.pp.ru> <199808220129.SAA13381@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 21, 1998 at 06:29:04PM -0700, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * This question was not about _maintaing_ particular port but about port > * _existence_ in whole ports structure, so scope is more wide than port > * maintainer area. > > It's still up to the maintainer. I almost never override the > maintainer's decision to delete or keep a port. At least not with > good reason. We can't keep it because it is duplicated in ImageMagick. It was the reason for delete. If you ever attempt to keep it, you'll got version mismatch in near future, since both ports overwrite the same files. > Besides, it is just plain rude to delete the port without at least > asking the maintainer first. Is it not rude to duplicate the port first without asking the maintainer? If we say A, the we need to say B, instead lots of junk files and version mismatch occurse. I not say A, I just say B. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ MTH/SH/HE S-- W-- N+ PEC>+ D A a++ C G>+ QH+(++) 666+>++ Y
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980822063125.A6226>