Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 20:08:46 -0400 From: Drew Baxter <netmonger@genesis.ispace.com> To: rotel@indigo.ie, FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Packet/traffic shapper ? Message-ID: <199809230009.UAA11487@Loki.orland.u91.k12.me.us> In-Reply-To: <199809222349.AAA01658@indigo.ie> References: <199809211827.OAA09675@Loki.orland.u91.k12.me.us> <netmonger@genesis.ispace.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:49 AM 9/23/98 +0000, Niall Smart wrote: > >Personally I don't think IPFW_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT is a bad idea, once you >are sure you have the accept rules necessary to ensure your connectivity >to the host you can pop in a deny all rule. This will probably be slower >than defaulting to deny though. --- Hm, isn't default_to_accept still affected by ipfw flush? --- Drew "Droobie" Baxter Network Admin/Professional Computer Nerd(TM) OneEX: The OneNetwork Exchange 207-942-0275 http://www.droo.orland.me.us To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809230009.UAA11487>