Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 01:32:01 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SOCKS port inspires question... Message-ID: <199809230732.BAA18835@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 23 Sep 1998 00:26:41 PDT." <199809230726.AAA11574@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> References: <199809230726.AAA11574@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199809230726.AAA11574@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Satoshi Asami writes: : That is exactly what people mean by "compile time" (as opposed to, : say, "run time"). If you meant "from inside the compiler", then I : don't know of any. OK. I had hoped that you would say "Oh, yes, just check __FreeBSD_MUMBLE_ELF__, which is always defined when you are building elf executables"... : Well, you are answering your own question here aren't you? :) Yes. I guess I am. So it sounds like a reasonable thing to do then? I hadn't planned on providing the symbolic link, since runsocks will use the correct one for the application being run. That should be OK, since applications never build against this library (and would fail to work in odd ways if they tried). Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809230732.BAA18835>