Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 02:51:21 -0800 From: "William R. Somsky" <wrsomsky@halcyon.com> To: Leigh Hart <hart@at.dotat.com>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@hotjobs.com> Cc: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d, and changes to /etc/rc? Message-ID: <19981127025121.A2117@halcyon.com> In-Reply-To: <199811172307.JAA18179@at.dotat.com>; from Leigh Hart on Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 09:37:40AM %2B1030 References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811171633530.2757-100000@bright.fx.genx.net> <199811172307.JAA18179@at.dotat.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 at 09:37:40AM +1030, Leigh Hart wrote: > > And far more dangerous on a production system - and Nik - can > I suggest you also implement the scripts as start|restart|stop > rather than just start|stop as far as arguments go! Here, I think that start|stop should be considered a required minimum for any of these scripts, but that any additional arguments would be allowed as appropriate. (Eg, I've written rc.d scripts w/ "restart", "install", "gentlerestart", etc...) Are you suggesting that "restart" should be a required argument? ________________________________________________________________________ William R. Somsky wrsomsky@halcyon.com Physicist, Baritone, Guitarist http://www.halcyon.com/wrsomsky To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981127025121.A2117>