Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 09:27:21 +0100 From: Marius Bendiksen <Marius.Bendiksen@scancall.no> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>, Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, rnordier@nordier.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD on i386 memory model Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19981124092721.00b9a6f0@mail.scancall.no> In-Reply-To: <19981123180039.T24412@follo.net> References: <3.0.5.32.19981123144319.00a4d560@mail.scancall.no> <Marius <199811181842.KAA06180@apollo.backplane.com> <3.0.5.32.19981120103442.0099f460@mail.scancall.no> <86hfvuia7y.fsf@detlev.UUCP> <3.0.5.32.19981123144319.00a4d560@mail.scancall.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>It adds too much complexity/interdependcies, in my opinion. Unless >somebody can show significant speed gains (well into the measurable >range), I don't think it is worthwhile. Of course, the speed gains would have to be significant. I totally agree on that part. --- Marius Bendiksen, IT-Trainee, ScanCall AS <marius@scancall.no> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.5.32.19981124092721.00b9a6f0>