Date: Tue, 24 Nov 1998 13:45:28 +0100 (MET) From: Sascha Schumann <sas@schell.de> To: Malte Lance <malte.lance@gmx.net> Cc: van.woerkom@netcologne.de, marc@netcologne.de, G.Sittig@abo.FreiePresse.DE, freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: isppp + dynamic IP Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.05.9811241314290.5772-100000@guerilla.foo.bar> In-Reply-To: <199811240859.JAA04306@neuron.webmore.prv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 24 Nov 1998, Malte Lance wrote: > On 23 Nov, Sascha Schumann wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Nov 1998, Malte Lance wrote: > > > >> On 22 Nov, Marc van Woerkom wrote: > >> > > >> > My guess is that this is some sort of control packet, by an older > >> > request of mine, that has not been completed (e.g. a lame ftp transfer), > >> > and that is now fooled because the IP at time of the request > >> > is different from the present IP now due to a hang up in between. > > > > These are sockets in WAIT state - somewhen timing out and sending one more > > packet. > > > >> Try this with telnet on linux. Does it work ? > > > > Yes. > > > >> As i said, there is much more than this. > > > > Not really. > > > >> Read the discussion i mentioned above. It also gives the reason, > >> why this solution only works for some clients. > > > > It works for Linux. > > Hm ... then it should be possible with FreeBSD and isdn4bsd. > What do you think about it Sascha ? I'm no kernel developer, but deciding on the size of the patch (274 lines diff), I'd say it is not as bad as you made it :-) If someone is interested, the original patch can be found on http://www.linuxhq.com/patch/20-p0468.html with a short description. Sascha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.05.9811241314290.5772-100000>