Date: Sat, 28 Nov 1998 02:20:48 +0000 From: "Paolo Di Francesco" <paipai@tin.it> To: alexandr@mail.eecis.udel.edu, freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: [Ultra] Compiler, again Message-ID: <19981128011824.COZ6908.fep04-svc@winworkstation> In-Reply-To: <199811272029.MAA22765@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> Wouldn't gcc28 be the best way to go? The only reason I say this is
> because I thought the decision was made to have that be the eventual
> upgrade of our compiler. This would definitely be incentive to push that
> project forward.
>
For me, no prob. But we have to wait a response from freebsd-core.
In the meantime, we can do experiments using _everything_! Do you want to use
your old "commodor64"? Use it ;)
WE need something to test (booter, experiment#1, experiment#2, etc...)
so we can learn from someone else code ;)
> Why gcc28? This has been discussed ad infinitum and you can search the
> list archives for postings by Terry "the man" Lambert for the reasoning
> behind gcc28 over egcs.
I have tried to find something about this, but nothing. 8(
Ciao Ciao
Paolo Di Francesco
_
->B<- All Recycled Bytes Message ...
~
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981128011824.COZ6908.fep04-svc>