Date: Fri, 04 Dec 1998 17:42:09 +0100 (CET) From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: BSDi IPv6 (was: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec?) Message-ID: <XFMail.981204174209.asmodai@wxs.nl> In-Reply-To: <19981202202328.B5527@klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Just as a sidenote: I just had an IPv6 course last week (25/26th of November) using BSDi 4.0 boxes. I don't know in how far they did it all themselves but the 6 people attending the course managed, while making the boxes run and talk IPv6, to panic the boxes quite a few times. For the rest the set-up and configuring was a breeze just when it came to userland tool flags it's confusing to use -ipv6 one time and -ip6 the next. Hope this sort of thing can be avoided or standardized under FreeBSD... Because it's a US product which was shipped to the Netherlands I had no possibility to check the true crypto stuff... Only verification was built in. But since security is one of the key points of the new IP stack I think this is really a major point, at least IMHO... I have to say that on the subject of INRIA vs KAME, the folks of KAME get my preference if only for their level of dedication to FreeBSD. But it's the functionality that counts. That's what's going to be the judge to the outside world ;) --- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven/Asmodai asmodai(at)wxs.nl | Cum angelis et pueris, Junior Network/Security Specialist | fideles inveniamur *BSD & picoBSD: The Power to Serve... <http://www.freebsd.org>; To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.981204174209.asmodai>