Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Dec 1998 11:07:30 +0100
From:      Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de>
To:        obrien@nuxi.ucdavis.edu, spork <spork@super-g.com>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NFS thoughts
Message-ID:  <19981227110730.04345@cicely.de>
In-Reply-To: <19981226231646.C19562@nuxi.com>; from David O'Brien on Sat, Dec 26, 1998 at 11:16:46PM -0800
References:  <19981214073605.20458@cicely.de> <Pine.BSF.4.00.9812141110220.28944-100000@super-g.inch.com> <19981226231646.C19562@nuxi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 26, 1998 at 11:16:46PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > Can anyone else help confirm that in general 2/udp is the most dependable
> > way to run if you're not traversing anything slower than 100Mb?  
> 
> Have you tried 3/udp or 2/tcp to see if the problem is with the transport
> port (ie. UDP/TCP) or the NFS protocol?
> 
I've already build properly working 3/udp connects together with sun/solaris stations.
Client and Server is running fine.
One day I had a panic on the FreeBSD side. Stack-trace showed that NFS was part of it.
I wish I had crashdumps enabled that day or at least a terminal with logging...

> -- 
> -- David    (obrien@NUXI.com  -or-  obrien@FreeBSD.org)

-- 
  B.Walter


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981227110730.04345>