Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 11:07:30 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely.de> To: obrien@nuxi.ucdavis.edu, spork <spork@super-g.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS thoughts Message-ID: <19981227110730.04345@cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <19981226231646.C19562@nuxi.com>; from David O'Brien on Sat, Dec 26, 1998 at 11:16:46PM -0800 References: <19981214073605.20458@cicely.de> <Pine.BSF.4.00.9812141110220.28944-100000@super-g.inch.com> <19981226231646.C19562@nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 26, 1998 at 11:16:46PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > Can anyone else help confirm that in general 2/udp is the most dependable > > way to run if you're not traversing anything slower than 100Mb? > > Have you tried 3/udp or 2/tcp to see if the problem is with the transport > port (ie. UDP/TCP) or the NFS protocol? > I've already build properly working 3/udp connects together with sun/solaris stations. Client and Server is running fine. One day I had a panic on the FreeBSD side. Stack-trace showed that NFS was part of it. I wish I had crashdumps enabled that day or at least a terminal with logging... > -- > -- David (obrien@NUXI.com -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) -- B.Walter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981227110730.04345>