Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 Feb 1999 15:08:04 +0000
From:      Josef Karthauser <joe@pavilion.net>
To:        Robert Nordier <rnordier@nordier.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: New boot blocks + serial hardware handshaking?
Message-ID:  <19990209150804.H83748@florence.pavilion.net>
In-Reply-To: <199901181739.TAA04407@ceia.nordier.com>; from Robert Nordier on Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 07:39:06PM %2B0200
References:  <19990118151749.A68260@florence.pavilion.net> <199901181739.TAA04407@ceia.nordier.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 07:39:06PM +0200, Robert Nordier wrote:
> Josef Karthauser wrote:
> 
> As the one who did the actual coding, I can confirm that the approach
> adopted in both the new bootblocks and the boot loader is virtually
> identical to that used in the older (biosboot) bootblocks.  In all
> cases, the simplest approach giving the smallest code sizes was
> used, so there's very little difference between the three sets of
> routines.
> 
> The above applies to 3.0-current.  In 3.0-release, the boot loader
> was still using BIOS routines (with hardware handshaking), but this
> was changed around late November 1998.

I've now confirmed this.  The problems that we saw in October have indeed
been fixed.  Thanks,
Joe
-- 
Josef Karthauser	FreeBSD: How many times have you booted today?
Technical Manager	Viagra for your server (http://www.uk.freebsd.org)
Pavilion Internet plc.  [joe@pavilion.net, joe@uk.freebsd.org, joe@tao.org.uk]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990209150804.H83748>