Date: Tue, 09 Feb 1999 20:37:21 +1000 From: Greg Black <gjb@comkey.com.au> To: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> Cc: "Kevin T. Likes" <klikes@isd.state.in.us>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: exmh 2.0.2 and wish8.0 eating memory on 3.0 Message-ID: <19990209103722.16811.qmail@alpha.comkey.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199902090207.UAA98919@nospam.hiwaay.net> of Mon, 08 Feb 1999 20:07:15 CST References: <199902090207.UAA98919@nospam.hiwaay.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Since you mention it, just looked at what wish8.0 was doing on my system > right now with exmh (3.0-stable, mostly elf). Eek! 10952k RES and SIZE > of 11528k according to top. Going to have to break down and print the > mutt manual and learn something new. Maybe procmail too. Might be better to follow up with the tcl/tk people and see why this is happening -- it's not at all normal for various versions of exmh and should not really be happening. I've got one exmh that's been running since last year and only uses 4 MB and another one that's been going a few days on FreeBSD that's only up to 5 MB, and I'd call that normal. > Possibly what is the final straw to break exmh's back is that sendmail > no longer accepts messages from my exmh unless I have a live DNS > connection. Good old: This sounds like a faulty sendmail config. I'm not going to suggest a fix because I stopped using sendmail years ago and it has evolved quite a bit since then. I'm sure somebody else will be able to help. > nmh-1.0 was announced the past week. Not sure if its in ports yet. But > maybe replacing mh-6.8.4 with nmh will fix my mh/sendmail problem. Setting up sendmail right would be far more likely to do that. Standard mh-6.8.4 works just fine. -- Greg Black <gjb@acm.org> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990209103722.16811.qmail>