Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 14:44:49 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste <vallo@matti.ee> To: mi@aldan.algebra.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: umount -f Message-ID: <19990211144449.A45575@matti.ee> In-Reply-To: <199902101854.NAA10601@misha.cisco.com>; from Mikhail Teterin on Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 01:54:53PM -0500 References: <19990210104842.A21617@relay.nuxi.com> <199902101854.NAA10601@misha.cisco.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 01:54:53PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin <mi@misha.cisco.com> wrote: > Nope: > > mi@xxx:/tmp (1044) umount -f -t nfs phosphorus:/phosphorus > umount: /phosphorus: Device busy > > It is not, that umount hangs, it is that it cares about the device being > busy despite `-f' flag. Or so it seems... send-pr? Do you have "hard" mount or "soft" mount? I have seen such behavior for "hard" mounts. -- Vallo Kallaste vallo@matti.ee To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990211144449.A45575>