Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 11:19:17 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: "Sean O'Connell" <sean@stat.Duke.EDU> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, FreeBSD mobile <freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: 3.1 Release versus HP Omnibook 900 Message-ID: <199903171819.LAA10698@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <19990317130456.B27659@stat.Duke.EDU> References: <19990317120304.A27659@stat.Duke.EDU> <199903171742.KAA10533@mt.sri.com> <19990317130456.B27659@stat.Duke.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Thanks, I added something like this to rc.pccard in both -current and > > -stable. Hopefully it works, but I have no way of testing it. (But > > apparently, no other committer seems to care either. :( ) > > > > It doesn't fix the other problems that need to be fixed, but at least it > > avoids having two PCIC's in the kernel, which is almost never right. > > > > > Nate- > > It hasn't made it into -STABLE yet (just did a cvsup on my -STABLE > box and rc.pccard is identical to 3.1-RELEASE) . Haven't cvsup'd > in a while on my home (-CURRENT) box. I *JUST* committed it only minutes ago when I saw the email message. :) > Any other reports of apm causing kernel panics (general protection > fault is the message and it is a trap 9 ). I saw some on dejanews. > (this mailing list too ... in mid February involving Valentin Shopov) > Has anything come of it? Should I be running this puppy under > current? No idea. I have no way of helping out since I don't run any 3.* boxes, so I can't even make any intelligent guesses. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903171819.LAA10698>