Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 15:32:47 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Swindells <rjs@fdy2.demon.co.uk> To: imp@harmony.village.org Cc: chuckr@mat.net, obrien@NUXI.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gdb 4.17 Message-ID: <199904051432.PAA00550@fdy2.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <199904041903.NAA82653@harmony.village.org> (message from Warner Losh on Sun, 04 Apr 1999 13:03:13 -0600)
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Warner Losh wrote: >In message <Pine.BSF.4.10.9903270752280.25868-100000@picnic.mat.net> Chuck Robey writes: >: You know what you're doing, but I want to suggest that perhaps you want >: to run that archs part past Warner, who recently (boy, I hope it was >: Warner, I think it was) added the MIPS stuff into the tree, and is >: pretty strongly in favor of making cross-compilation possible. >Yes. I added support to our binutils to generate mips binaries. I >think that if other groups want their port in the tree, that should be >the first step, with the second making egcs work for the port. I hope >to have that done in the next couple of weeks. The only other two >architectures that I think there'd be support for would be sparc and >arm. I would vote for including sparc and arm as well. I'm getting a SparcStation next month and want to get either a SA1100/SA1101 evaluation board or a Chaltech motherboard for work. Robert Swindells To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904051432.PAA00550>