Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 18:29:17 +0900 From: Tomoaki NISHIYAMA <tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp> To: listmail@helena.callcenter.systemhaus.net Cc: tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Subject: Re: Fiberline Ethernet, part two Message-ID: <19990417182917T.tomoaki@moss.nibb.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <199904161838.UAA02904@helena.otelo-call.de> References: <199904161838.UAA02904@helena.otelo-call.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Christoph Weber-Fahr <listmail@helena.callcenter.systemhaus.net>
Subject: Re: Fiberline Ethernet, part two
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 20:38:57 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <199904161838.UAA02904@helena.otelo-call.de>
listmail> In tests this gives me between 300 and 600 KBps. Is this to be
listmail> expected via PCMCIA, or should it be faster ?
It is likely that its working well.
listmail> Is PAO worth installing now that my card works without it ?
Perhaps not necessary, but if the only card to be used were a network
card, I would use 3.1 RELEASE or 3.1-STABLE.
I stay 2.2 for the SCSI card, and love PAO for SCSI_DETACH.
--------
Tomoaki Nishiyama
e-mail:tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Department of Biological Sciences,
Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990417182917T.tomoaki>