Date: Tue, 27 Apr 1999 22:22:58 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com>, Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net>, Peter Mutsaers <plm@xs4all.nl>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: suspend mode broken since one week ago Message-ID: <199904280422.WAA04592@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 Apr 1999 17:10:25 MDT." <199904272310.RAA06057@mt.sri.com> References: <199904272310.RAA06057@mt.sri.com> <199904271352.HAA17555@harmony.village.org> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9904272322530.36113-100000@herring.nlsystems.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199904272310.RAA06057@mt.sri.com> Nate Williams writes: : Someone submitted a patch that checked to see if the BIOS returned a : value > 64M, and if so to 'accept' it's value for the memory, since it's : more likely to be correct. I'd like to apply it to -current, but I'm : not sure of the political ramifications.... I think that it would be OK to do this, especially if you were able to sanity check the numbers against something else... If it isn't possible to do a sanity check, then I'd still be tempted to commit it, making it an option if it causes problems for a significant number (> 1%) of people. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904280422.WAA04592>