Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 12 Jun 1999 16:41:19 +0200
From:      Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@ninth-circle.org>
To:        Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk>
Cc:        Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai@wxs.nl>, FreeBSD Documentation <doc@freebsd.org>, Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: DocProj
Message-ID:  <19990612164119.C19595@ninth-circle.org>
In-Reply-To: <19990610232052.A69521@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>; from Nik Clayton on Thu, Jun 10, 1999 at 11:20:52PM %2B0100
References:  <19990608185612.A52754@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <19990610232052.A69521@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Nik Clayton (nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk) [990611 02:00]:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 1999 at 06:56:12PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> > ===>  Installing for jadetex-2.3
> > ===>   jadetex-2.3 depends on executable: tex - found
> > install: jadetex.fmt: No such file or directory
> > *** Error code 71
> > 
> > teTeX-beta and jade did compile alright and installed alright here though.
> > Looking in /usr/local/share/texmf/web2c didn't reveal the jadetex.fmt file.
> > Hints?
> 
> Looks like print/jadetex's "make" didn't build jadetex.fmt.  Check the
> print/jadetex/work/ directory.  If there's no jadetex.fmt file in there
> then the build didn't work.

It's not in there...

This might be the reason it's not being made:

(/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/french/base/french.ldf
File: french.ldf 1997/08/26 v1.5 french option of babel loading the French pack
age

(/usr/local/share/texmf/tex/french/base/french.sty
Package: french 1999/02/18  The French package /V4,05b/


 -52- Error: the french package doesn't run in such minimal document class, sor
ry!

Did ye even encounter it yerself Nik? Or am I getting all sorts of errors
no-one sees but I always get? *chuckle* =)

> > Second, I saw that teTeX 1.0 hit the fan, so we're able to continue
> > the teTeX-story finally using non-beta software?
> 
> In theory, yep.  It needs testing with the FDP stuff before we replace
> teTeX-beta however.

True... I am a willing victim ;)

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven                asmodai(at)wxs.nl
        The *BSD Programmer's Documentation Project 
Network/Security Specialist      <http://home.wxs.nl/~asmodai>;
*BSD & (g)VIM : Accept no limitations...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990612164119.C19595>