Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 21:34:51 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@ca.sandia.gov> To: Kiril Mitev <kiril@ideaglobal.com> Cc: bmah@california.sandia.gov, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PGP ver.5 - is this the way its supposed to be ? Message-ID: <19990713213451.A19836@ca.sandia.gov> In-Reply-To: <199907131825.SAA35648@loki.ideaglobal.com>; from Kiril Mitev on Tue, Jul 13, 1999 at 06:25:27PM %2B0000 References: <199907131747.KAA16844@stennis.ca.sandia.gov> <199907131825.SAA35648@loki.ideaglobal.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jul 13, 1999 at 06:25:27PM +0000, Kiril Mitev wrote: > > PGP 5 is a little different than PGP 2 in that it's designed to be > > invoked as a bunch of different commands, rather than one command with > > a flag to choose its behavior. So: <snip> > Mmm Hmm > > Who gets to fix elm/kdemail/etc, then :-) ? Their developer communities, of course. The two mailers I use (mutt and exmh) both had to have explicit support for PGP 5 added. (exmh's support is still under development, for the record.) Just to make things even more interesting, gpg uses a completely different set of command line flags and arguments for either PGP 2 or PGP 5. :-p Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990713213451.A19836>