Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 19:10:02 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca> To: Anton Berezin <tobez@plab.ku.dk> Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/13030: Many ports use ``chown'' rather than ``/usr/sbin/chown'' in their Makefiles Message-ID: <19990812191002.C47301@mad> In-Reply-To: <19990812160501.B57548@lion.plab.ku.dk>; from Anton Berezin on Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 04:05:01PM %2B0200 References: <19990809083649.B97354@mad> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9908090901570.72927-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> <19990812125750.B56987@lion.plab.ku.dk> <19990812093835.A44972@mad> <19990812160501.B57548@lion.plab.ku.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 12, 1999 at 04:05:01PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
>
> > > # skip clever CHOWN assignments - they are unnecessary
> > > next if m%^\s*CHOWN\s*\??=\s*(?:/usr/sbin/)?chown\s*$%;
I mean it should just issue a short warning. I assume the number of
these lines is small enough that whoever reads the warning can just
remove the lines themself.
> > > s%/usr/sbin/chown%\${CHOWN}%g;
> >
> > Better add \s+ to the start of that, just to be safe. Shouldn't make
>
> No! Consider @/usr/sbin/chown - there are plenty of these.
You're right. You could try [\s@] (is that legal? I don't think so,
but I mean it's legal equivalent... :). Or your suggestion,
slightly modified, [^}$/].
It's quite likely not worth worrying about too much.
--
This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990812191002.C47301>