Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:55:23 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: at_shutdown going away Message-ID: <199908212155.PAA49041@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 21 Aug 1999 14:43:59 PDT." <199908212143.OAA01442@dingo.cdrom.com> References: <199908212143.OAA01442@dingo.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199908212143.OAA01442@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes: : If you're going to do that, take a look at the ACPI spec and implement : at least the base set of power states that it defines, since we are : going to have to live with hardware that behaves like that for some : time to come. Good idea... However, most ACPI machines have a legacy APM model, which is what the device methods support. When the ACPI stuff comes it, it will likely need to expand the methods... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908212155.PAA49041>