Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 09:37:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Stephen McKay <syssgm@detir.qld.gov.au> Cc: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>, freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Seagate vs Quantum.. opinions? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9908270937030.2537-100000@semuta.feral.com> In-Reply-To: <199908270944.TAA28444@nymph.detir.qld.gov.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thursday, 26th August 1999, David Kelly wrote: > > >Matthew Jacob writes: > >> IBM drives are okay, but like a lot of IBM stuff, sometimes do things > >> gratuitously different. > > > >Speaking of which, "camcontrol defects -f block" and every other > >variation of "camcontrol defects" fails to list the bad blocks on my > >IBM drives. > > >Similar messages when using Adaptec SCSI cards. > > Oh! I've been blaming my ncr SCSI card! (Well, the driver for it, at least.) > I'm sure everyone complaining about not being able to read defects lists is > using an ncr based card. I've got some non-ibm disks I can temporarily hook > up. I'll try them too. And I'll try an aha-1540 too just for kicks. If it's a problem with other than the drive, send-pr as appropriate or it won't get fixed (no snickers from the audience, please...) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9908270937030.2537-100000>