Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 Aug 1999 16:33:33 -0600
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>
Cc:        Foxfair Hu <foxfair@drago.cert.org.tw>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD, the follower of Linux ?
Message-ID:  <4.2.0.58.19990831153723.00a39c60@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <19990831220632.B58178@daemon.ninth-circle.org>
References:  <4.2.0.58.19990831094953.04670380@localhost> <37CB916C12C.56BBFOXFAIR@drago.cert.org.tw> <4.2.0.58.19990831094953.04670380@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:06 PM 8/31/99 +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:

>[People easily offended by strong words, go read another message]
>
>* Brett Glass (brett@lariat.org) [990831 18:33]:
>
> >What I'm concerned about, though, is that the developers might literally try 
> >to sabotage such an effort. In that case, it'd be necessary to do a fork
> >(which I'd hate to do; it entails much wasted and duplicated work) or to go 
> >with one of the other BSDs (perhaps OpenBSD). So, I'm in somewhat of a
> >quandary here. Would Jordan Hubbard, in a million years, even accept the existence
> >of an effort that would actively market and evangelize BSD UNIX? Would Walnut
> >Creek try to take FreeBSD private if such an effort became too successful?
>
>For blood's sake Brett,
>
>are you bloddy paranoid or something?

No, just realistic. Jordan has said before, to me personally, that he'll see
Linux-style evangelism for FreeBSD "over [his] dead body." I don't think I'm
being paranoid if I take Jordan at his word -- figuratively, if not literally.

>Every mail you sent nowadays always mentions Jordan as the big bad wolf
>and with you being the humble sheep that only wants to do this or that.

I don't think that the above is a fair assessment. I *do* fault Jordan for
FreeBSD's failures in the areas of advocacy, marketing, and PR, and I think
that this is justified since he is the leader of the project and has
been quite outspoken in his opposition to effective tactics in this area.
But " big bad wolf?" No.

>In the beginning of my mailinglist forays I had respect for you due to
>your analysis of the GPL and all that related. However you wasted all
>your respect by now.

I'm sorry that you feel that way. I personally have done my best to be
consistent, upfront, ethical, and forthcoming with my views, and to stick
to this approach even in the face of opposition or attempts to quash
dissent. I would hope that this would ENGENDER respect, but of course,
everyone uses different criteria to determine what they will respect
and what they will not. One cannot satisfy everyone, so I simply seek
to exhibit qualities that I personally find worthy of respect.

>By now I think you and your rabit behaviour actually matches Theo's
>zealotry and I would sincerely suggest to relocate your efforts to
>OpenBSD as you already hinted at in the above.

I haven't been "rabid" by any means, nor have I exhibited many of
the traits that cause Theo to grate on others. (One trait I *have*
exhibited is stubbornness, but then, Jordan and you yourself do
too.)

>Also, for all your `preaching' and `evanglism' you even consider
>forking yet another BSD? Then I see you have learned as little as you
>continuously chose to criticise Jordan for.

I said -- if you'll reread my message -- that if I made a serious investment
in a distribution of FreeBSD I would have no CHOICE but to fork it if
Jordan and/or Walnut Creek acted, in some way, to harm that effort. As
I mentioned there, I consider forking to be wasteful and unnecessary.
But I do recognize that Jordan is an employee of Walnut Creek. That means
that, legally, Walnut Creek could begin to claim ownership of any contribution
he made to the project on company time. (I would hope that this would
never happen, but if one is making a substantial investment one must always
consider such a risk and disclose it to investors.) Walnut Creek would have a 
financial incentive to do this if it decided to cut out CheapBytes and/or other 
companies that might publish distributions of FreeBSD. US law is very clear
on the fact that this is possible.

>The developers welcome advocacy, in fact, some of us do it through
>development in ways you probably can't understand 

Development is not advocacy. It may foster or facilitate advocacy,
and advocacy, in turn, may help development by aiding the recruitment
of good developers. Nonetheless, they are two very different activities.
I understand very well how the two interact.

>since you appear too
>focused on your own little private agenda.

I am not focused on any specific agenda. What I offer, in fact, is
a "big picture" view from the outside -- one that might not be available
to some who are too close to the project to get this perspective.

>Also, in all my encounters with Jordan I am starting to see his points
>more and more and I admit sometimes wonder at certain things he does,
>but after all, Jordan is not god, or Mr. BSD, or whatever, he's only
>human and IMNSHO entitled to make mistakes.

Agreed. However, he is widely regarded as "Mr. FreeBSD" and/or as a
demigod (or maybe a hemidemisemigod?) by many. Certainly, there are some
who accept his opinion less critically than they should, or because they
fear that dissent will cause problems. (I personally think that controversy
is healthy.)

>Can you finally accept stuff like this and start to actually do
>SOMETHING?

I actually have been doing quite a lot. Some of what I've been up to
cannot be made public due to client confidentiality, etc. But even so, 
the things that ARE public -- the large installations of BSD UNIX 
(not all are FreeBSD, but most are), the magazine articles, etc. --
have made a big difference. I daresay that I'm frequently responsible
when BSD UNIX is mentioned in articles which spotlight Linux.

Before I go much further with bigger plans, however, I need assurances 
that I will be able to pursue the release of a heavily evangelized 
distribution without direct opposition from key players. It's OK if they 
wouldn't do what I do THEMSELVES. However, I don't want to wind up in an 
emergency situation where my project would be forced to fork, or suddenly 
switch to another BSD-derived system such as NetBSD or OpenBSD, to continue. 
Right now, I see a real risk of that, for two reasons: First, Jordan is 
currently an employee of Walnut Creek, which may see a financial
interest in precluding the development of other distributions. I'd want
assuranced from Jordan and RAB that this would not happen. Second,
Jordan and some other key players have vocally opposed the sort of
active evangelism which, memetically, is necessary for FreeBSD to compete
against Linux in the software ecosystem. (Right now, BSD's niche in that
ecosystem is being eroded.)

>We have a saying here in Rotterdam which translates to "No words, but
>deeds." You sir, should probably never relocate to Rotterdam.

Actually, I found it to be a nice place during my brief visit. But, as stated
above, my deeds speak for themselves. Now, it could be that, to you, nothing
but committed code counts as "deeds," but I hope not. Such a view would
be very shortsighted -- right now, evangelism and promotion matter much
more. In fact, without them, the current shortage of developers to fix
known problems (recently cited by Matt Dillon and others in other threads
here) may worsen, as more and more find that Linux offers them a better return 
on their investments of time and effort. 

>Enjoy your ongoing BSD life. I hope I will not be a part of it in
>whatever idea you want to give to these words.

You don't have to be a part of it, though you may change your mind once you
see the results. What I ask is that my efforts not be actively opposed by you
or by The Powers That Be, such as they are. 

Call my ideas silly or Quixotic if you will; that's fine. (As I've said above, 
I have no problem with controversy.) But I need to know that I can pursue
this project without a risk of problems due to "friendly fire," as it were.

--Brett Glass



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.58.19990831153723.00a39c60>