Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Sep 1999 15:16:01 +0200
From:      Volker Stolz <stolz@Pool.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
To:        Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Cc:        Volker Stolz <stolz@Pool.Informatik.RWTH-Aachen.DE>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Erratic SCSI-ZIP throughput
Message-ID:  <19990914151601.A378@solo.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>
In-Reply-To: <19990912114608.U10106@freebie.lemis.com>; from Greg Lehey on Sun, Sep 12, 1999 at 11:46:08AM %2B0930
References:  <19990909123919.A6053@solo.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> <19990912114608.U10106@freebie.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Sep 12, 1999 at 11:46:08AM +0930, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Thursday,  9 September 1999 at 12:39:19 +0200, Volker Stolz wrote:
> > I always wondered why my ZIP is sooo slow (under FreeBSD, Win98 flies!), so I measured it
> > using "ftp localhost" with a mounted ZIP and msdos-FS.
> > Few files (all of about 5MB, give or take a few bytes) were transfered with ca. 1.8M/s,
> > while most just made it to 80K/s and sometimes even below.
> > I'm using the ncr810, everything is properly terminated. The problem occured under 2.2.x, too.
> 
> There's a certain amount of overhead involved in copying a file, and I
> suspect that what you're seeing is related, especially if the big
> files are moving fast.  What does iostat show?  I don't know the
> specs, but I'd expect about 30 to 50 transfers a second for a Zip
> drive.

You're right, it shows 48 tps and 0.09 M/s. But hell, that's too slow! At least compared
with acceses from Win{NT,98} to the same drive.
-- 
Volker Stolz * stolz@pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de * PGP


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990914151601.A378>