Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 19:02:31 +0400 From: Dmitrij Tejblum <tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libtermcap termcap.c Message-ID: <199909291502.TAA67807@arc.hq.cti.ru> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 29 Sep 1999 10:49:18 EDT." <199909291449.KAA19308@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> <<On Wed, 29 Sep 1999 13:41:14 +0400, Dmitrij Tejblum <tejblum@arc.hq.cti.ru> said: > > > The whole purpose of the sigbal-related code in getcwd.c, res_send.c and > > termcap.c is binary compatibility with the FreeBSD 2.2 (and below) kernels. > > That is about to go by the wayside, since we are about to change all > of the signal-related system calls. Yeah, so I still wonder what the sigemptyset() vs bzero() changes was supposed to achieve... Dima To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909291502.TAA67807>