Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 00:08:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Chuck Robey <chuckr@picnic.mat.net> To: Bakul Shah <bakul@torrentnet.com> Cc: tbuswell@acadia.net, Thomas David Rivers <rivers@dignus.com>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: X11/C++ question Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9910270004510.29073-100000@picnic.mat.net> In-Reply-To: <199910270339.XAA11567@chai.torrentnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Bakul Shah wrote: > Allow me add something to what the FAQ-Xt says. > > I find it more convenient to immediately call a non-static > function as shown below (using a slightly modified example > from the FAQ). Just got out of the shower, where I was wondering why they didn't suggest the same thing. I was going to experiment with this way, since it fit more closely with the way I like to code C++ (I don't like to code C++, you understand, so my C++ code is always straining to look like C). Thanks, Bakul. This looks much better. Thanks, folks, for letting me pull hackers away from FreeBSD for a minute, but let's not let it get out of hand; we better stop before we strain other's patience. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chuck Robey | Interests include C programming, Electronics, 213 Lakeside Dr. Apt. T-1 | communications, and signal processing. Greenbelt, MD 20770 | I run picnic.mat.net: FreeBSD-current(i386) and (301) 220-2114 | jaunt.mat.net : FreeBSD-current(Alpha) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9910270004510.29073-100000>