Date: Thu, 04 Nov 1999 16:48:32 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: eischen@vigrid.com (Daniel M. Eischen), julian@whistle.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threads goals version III Message-ID: <199911050048.QAA49642@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 04 Nov 1999 23:14:21 GMT." <199911042314.QAA20206@usr07.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> One could argue that the program should be using a hybrid scheduling > class in the kernel in order to achieve this effect, rather than > having to have the idea that you would want to schedule seperate > kernel schedulable entities within one program. How to you propose to handle priorieties for different "thread thingies" --- "thread thingies" being a yet to be defined thread implementation. What I am think is that for whatever reason there are applications which want threads to be running at different priorities for instance "Kaffe" wants or needs threads running at different priorities. *Not interested in arguing about whether Kaffe's thread management is broken or not *. -- Amancio Hasty hasty@rah.star-gate.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199911050048.QAA49642>