Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 29 May 2015 23:25:58 -0300
From:      Marcelo Gondim <gondim@bsdinfo.com.br>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 9.3 - Intel X520-SR2 stops passing packets
Message-ID:  <55691FB6.5090307@bsdinfo.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <1FB15FA4-6185-4206-9517-AE9667A1A57C@gmail.com>
References:  <C8B78CF4-184C-4BFE-B848-37A91A3B696B@gmail.com> <5560C395.8020807@farrokhi.net> <5564852D.8040008@bsdinfo.com.br> <1FB15FA4-6185-4206-9517-AE9667A1A57C@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28-05-2015 11:14, Guy Helmer wrote:
>> On May 26, 2015, at 9:37 AM, Marcelo Gondim <gondim@bsdinfo.com.br> wrote:
>>
>> On 23-05-2015 15:14, Babak Farrokhi wrote:
>>> Look at the interrupts per queue. 500,000 is the maximum and it is the
>>> reason your interface is not accepting new packets.
>>>
>>>> Guy Helmer <mailto:guy.helmer@gmail.com>
>>>> May 21, 2015 at 6:03 PM
>>>> I’ve noticed that there have been reports of problems with Intel
>>>> X520-SR2 network interfaces stopping working. I think I’m seeing a
>>>> similar issue where the 10Gb interfaces stop receiving traffic
>>>> (they’re being used in promiscuous mode to sniff traffic from a tap).
>>>> ifconfig shows the interfaces are still active and the links are OK.
>>>> ifconfig down/up restores activity. I’ve changed
>>>> hw.intr_storm_threshold=8000 but I couldn’t tell if the interrupt
>>>> storm threshold had been triggered at the time the interfaces stopped
>>>> passing traffic.
>>>>
>>>> Output from sysctl:
>>>>
>>>> . . .
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had this problem and one day updated the system 10.1- RELEASE to 10.1- STABLE and the problem stopped. I was one years with this problem and a script running and testing the interface when the interface stopped working I was doing exactly what you did. Today I no longer have that problem anymore.
>>
>> I'm using 10.1-STABLE r281235
>
> Thanks for the indication of success with 10.1-STABLE. I am locked into using FreeBSD 9.x until I can go through the whole integration and acceptance testing cycle for 10.x, so I’m trying to find a solution that works on in 9.x. I have reviewed the diffs between 9.3 and 10.1-STABLE for ixgbe driver and haven’t noticed anything that stands out.
>
Guy,

I may be wrong but I think the change was not the ixgbe driver.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55691FB6.5090307>