Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:46:38 -0600 From: Nikolas Britton <freebsd@nbritton.org> To: Freebsd0101@aol.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thank you! Message-ID: <41E8138E.4050109@nbritton.org> In-Reply-To: <1dc.346b404d.2f1967b4@aol.com> References: <1dc.346b404d.2f1967b4@aol.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Freebsd0101@aol.com wrote: >In a message dated 1/14/05 1:07:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, zettel@acm.org >writes: > > >>>still-under-development 5.x. Which seems counterproductive for an O/S >>>that is trying to establish itself as a choice as a server platform. >>> >>> >>Not necessarily. The interesting question hasn't been addressed yet. >>Is 5.3 on its fastest supported chipset faster or slower than 4.10 on >>its fastest supported chipset? >> >> >---- >Thats a sad commentary, if the "new" version of FreeBSD is 5% faster on >a hardware platform that should be 30% faster. Is that the goal you seek? > >so you have to pay 50% more to get the same performance on 5.3. Thats >quite a selling point! > > Is that you Tm4528@aol.com?, whats TM for btw, Troll Master?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41E8138E.4050109>