Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 13:22:18 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Hagan <dhagan@cs.vt.edu> To: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/12915: Will this get committed before next release? Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0001281318370.16328-100000@vtopus.cs.vt.edu> In-Reply-To: <20000128102143.D1417@shadow.blackdawn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000, Will Andrews wrote: > On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 10:15:40AM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > > However, ache's time is pretty limited. Also, you should know that the > > preferred diff type is unified, not context.. > > I just noticed ache moved the Responsiblity back to freebsd-ports. So, > just tell me if the diff works for Elm 2.5, against the latest port. No, it doesn't apply cleanly to the latest version (didn't notice that earlier). It appears that 2.4MEpl68 doesn't have the y2k problem from earlier. I'm not familiar with the ME variant, but would it be more appropriate for there to be an elm-ME port and a regular elm port? If so, I can submit my collection as a new port instead. Daniel -- Daniel Hagan Computer Science CSE dhagan@cs.vt.edu http://www.cs.vt.edu/~dhagan/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.21.0001281318370.16328-100000>