Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 01:35:35 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: openssl in -current Message-ID: <200002210835.BAA19537@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 20 Feb 2000 13:22:15 PST." <20000220132215.F14682@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20000220132215.F14682@dragon.nuxi.com> <38AF5F59.A0BEC49@gorean.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002191942240.2430-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20000220132215.F14682@dragon.nuxi.com> "David O'Brien" writes: : Which OpenBSD has done -- so why was it so easy for them? They have the : *same* rules to live by that we have -- even though they are Canadian, : the rsaref libs came from USA, thus they cannot be exported from Canada. No. The RSA that they have does NOT come from rsaref. The default tree that one gets with OpenBSD doesn't have ANY RSA AT ALL. ONE MUST JUST THROUGH UGLY HOOPS TO GET IT. I know. I've just jumped through those hoops for my OpenBSD/arc machine. Otherwise ssh, et al, say something to the effect that this software used rsa functionality and this version of OpenSSL wasn't compiled for it. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200002210835.BAA19537>