Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:10:28 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: break in libcrypto? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002211801540.505-100000@alphplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20000220143745.A15548@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 02:14:21PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > stand by my comment that 'make depend' is needed generally, though - > > things often fail elsewhere in the tree (e.g. gcc, perl) Only in broken makefiles. I once fixed all makefiles used by makeworld to work with `make -jLarge' without `make depend' in the NOSECURE case. makeworld used to depend on this (at least in the -jLarge case) until recent pessimisations in it (building dependencies slows it down by 10%). > Yes, give a log. Look at all the gunk in > src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/Makefile to keep a `make depend' from being > required. cc_tools/Makefile too the most work to fix :-). Most of the gunk is required to make dependencies actually work. Once you have correct dependencies (less the ones generated by `make depend'), it is a small step to make the `make depend' step optional. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0002211801540.505-100000>