Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:45:13 +0900 From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org> To: honda@kashio.info.mie-u.ac.jp Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/16863: new port japanese/esecanna-wnn6 Message-ID: <86snylg812.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:19:38 %2B0900" <20000222111938P.honda@kashio.info.mie-u.ac.jp> References: <200002211240.EAA13245@freefall.freebsd.org> <86aekuvbf7.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> <20000222111938P.honda@kashio.info.mie-u.ac.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,
At Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:19:38 +0900,
HONDA Yasuhiro <honda@kashio.info.mie-u.ac.jp> wrote:
> "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org> wrote:
..
> > Also, I suppose it would be nice if we get all the esecanna ports
> > fit in with one another. How do you think? I mean, each port should
> > conform itself to one style, say, DESCR, MESSAGE, and the way to
> > configure.
> I also made esecanna-vje30, independent of you. My esecanna-wnn6 port
> can coexist with my esecanna-vje30, because system rc file
> (${PREFIX}/etc/escannarc) and server executable is installed as
> different file, like esecannarc_wnn6, esecannaserver_wnn6.
That's not what I'm talking about. You didn't answer me. You say
your -wnn6 port and _your_ -vje30 port can coexist and it's okay, but
what does that mean? If you find something to improve the present
-vje30 port in, you could request it. Please do not keep it in your
own thing.
Anyway, I've been thinking of changing names of files that -vje30
port installs, like yours. I'll send a patch soon.
--
/
/__ __
/ ) ) ) ) /
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( <knu@idaemons.org>
"If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice."
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86snylg812.wl>