Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 11:10:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Blaz Zupan <blaz@amis.net> To: Dima Ruban <dima@rdy.com> Cc: Brian Fundakowski Feldman <green@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/miscfs/linprocfs linprocfs_misc.c Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0003271108500.77125-100000@titanic.medinet.si> In-Reply-To: <200003270851.AAA93733@sivka.rdy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Nobody's actually saying "nuke it and bury it". The suggestion was to move to > ports collection. And I agree with it. > > I'm not sure how easy it would be (probably not very, because it depends > > on FreeBSD sources?) to put it in ports together with the Linux emulation > > libraries. After all, its of no use if you don't have the Linux emulation > > running. > > Well, generally speaking, everything in ports depends on FreeBSD sources to > the certain extent. Not true. I can have an empty /usr/src and compile most of the ports. I'm not sure if linprocfs will be the same, I admit I haven't looked at the source close enough to see if it would compile "stand alone". Blaz Zupan, blaz@amis.net, http://home.amis.net/blaz/ Medinet d.o.o., Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0003271108500.77125-100000>