Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 01:06:20 -0300 From: lioux@uol.com.br To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/17941: New port devel/lwp needed for coda 5.3.6 Message-ID: <20000413010620.A488@Fedaykin.here> In-Reply-To: <20000412210338.M23367@jade.chc-chimes.com>; from billf@chc-chimes.com on Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 09:03:38PM -0400 References: <200004121650.JAA56122@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000412210338.M23367@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 09:03:38PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 09:50:04AM -0700, lioux@uol.com.br wrote: > > > > > I took over the maintainership of the port since I'll probably be able > > to handle the port format better than the coda team. > > > > However, I added proper coda contact information on pkg/DESC. > > I'm vetoing this change (for whatever weight that holds.) > > The CODA people are interested in maintaining their own ports. I've been > in contact (by proxy) with them. Okidokie. Fine by me. :) Just one thing, do use my shar instead of theirs since it is cleaner and correct. Futhermore, apply the supplied patch. Just change the maintainer back. The patch fixes DESCR. Just hope this makes it soon so that I can get back to get coda 5.3.6 working. Their port is not working on STABLE (yesterday's). Besides, they do know their code so they can better answer questions relating to the code. I was taking the maintainership just to handle the port tree stuff. Nevertheless, I can do that through PRs. God bless GNATS. ;) -- Regards, mfereora To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000413010620.A488>