Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 17:42:19 +0700 (NSS) From: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> To: "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@pinyon.org> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ACE wrappers Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004141734040.4255-100000@iclub.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20000413172737.07E856D@pinyon.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, there! On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Russell L. Carter wrote: > %Is there anyone who built ACE wrappers + TAO successfully and got it > %working properly under RELENG_4? > > But of course... www.pinyon.org/ace thanks for quick reply! > %I have strange problems when using native C++ exceptions. > %The same stuff under 3.4-STABLE (with g++295) works flawlessly. > > Native exceptions were working beautifully up till sometime > around September '99 but broke thereafter and were broken > still when I checked a month or so ago. The problem appears > to me to be thread related, so it's almost certainly a > libgcc problem, but I and several other people expended > a considerable amount of time trying to find the source and > failed. FWIW, native exceptions are disabled in the Linux > threaded versions now too. What are drawbacks of using ACE built without threads? Is it possible to make native exceptions work under RELENG_4 or RELENG_3 or should we use ACE exceptions instead (we also plan to build our product under Win32, Solaris and Linux)? Do ACE exceptions work under FreeBSD properly? thanks in advance /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0004141734040.4255-100000>