Date: Fri, 05 May 2000 19:08:19 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> Cc: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams), Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pc98/conf GENERIC Message-ID: <1555.957546499@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 May 2000 11:05:02 MDT." <200005051705.LAA55020@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200005051705.LAA55020@harmony.village.org>, Warner Losh writes: >In message <200005051645.KAA21055@nomad.yogotech.com> Nate Williams writes: >: > : %s,/arch,,g >: > >: > Why? Unless we're only ever going to have a couple archs. If NetBSD >: > did that, there would now be 30 directories at the top level. Are we >: > sure that we're only ever going to be on 3 archs? >: >: I don't see us supporting more than half-dozen, that's for sure. But, >: that's my vision, and may not be shared by other committers. :) > > >:-). I can easily see a sparc and sparc64 joining the list. If I had >more time, there'd be a few mips ports: sgi, arc, hpcmips, pmax (I >have all this hardware, btw). There are those that want FreeBSD/68k >as well. > >But until there are more, I suppose you do have a point. Uhm, isn't it exactly while we have very few ports we should do this, rather than wait until the transition has become unmanageable ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1555.957546499>