Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 02:20:03 +0900 From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org> To: karelj@wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_procfs status? (was Re: vmware2 status?) Message-ID: <86r9bbd4jg.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Tue, 9 May 2000 14:32:52 %2B0200" <20000509143252.A1069@wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl> References: <8666sp53tf.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005081550240.67941-100000@thelab.hub.org> <864s886ega.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> <20000509143252.A1069@wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 9 May 2000 14:32:52 +0200,
Karel J. Bosschaart <karelj@wop21.wop.wtb.tue.nl> wrote:
> I'm wondering whether the MESSAGE about adding linprocfs to /etc/fstab
> makes sense since the port already installs /usr/local/etc/rc.d/linprocfs.sh,
> which does the job. On my machine (4.0-Stable), putting it in fstab didn't
> even work because the linprocfs.ko is not in /modules but in
> /usr/local/modules, so it could not be found.
You're quite right, and I've just got rid of that part from MESSAGE.
Thanks.
--
/
/__ __
/ ) ) ) ) /
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( @ idaemons.org / FreeBSD.org
"We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86r9bbd4jg.wl>