Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 18:24:35 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> To: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: envy.vuurwerk.nl daily run output Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0005101822480.28789-100000@achilles.silby.com> In-Reply-To: <20000510171745.E61969@linkfast.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Matthew Fuller wrote: > On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 04:42:54PM -0500, a little birdie told me > that Mike Silbersack remarked > > > > See, I'm not sure that authorized_keys are user files, as they perform the > > same function that system passwords do. And since ssh is now part of the > > base system, they should be considered equal in importance to the password > > file. > > Well, consider that authorized_keys files perform the same function as > .rhosts. Would you propose doing the same for them? I don't use telnet/rshd/etc, so I don't care about them. But in a paranoid system, I suppose they would be tracked. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0005101822480.28789-100000>