Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 00:08:48 +0530 From: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in> To: j mckitrick <jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org> Cc: Matthew Hunt <mph@astro.caltech.edu>, Christoph Sold <so@server.i-clue.de>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux emulation and office suites Message-ID: <20000628000848.H12860@physics.iisc.ernet.in> In-Reply-To: <20000627192043.A76159@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>; from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org on Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 07:20:43PM %2B0100 References: <20000627025036.A63418@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20000627113714.D5878@physics.iisc.ernet.in> <20000627131638.A70989@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <3958B8C1.7C37DA6E@i-clue.de> <20000627111135.A87093@wopr.caltech.edu> <20000627192043.A76159@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
j mckitrick said on Jun 27, 2000 at 19:20:43: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 11:11:35AM -0700, Matthew Hunt wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 04:22:57PM +0200, Christoph Sold wrote: > > > > > IMHO it would be _very_ nice to have StarOffice rtunning under *BSD, > > > either in Linux emulation, or -even better- native. > > > > You mean like /usr/ports/editors/staroffice5 ? > > > > I don't know how this vicious rumor of it not being ports got > > started. I've never used it (although my officemate found it > > useful under Solaris), but I easily found it with: > > i think there are two possibilities here. first, the bsd port is often a > minor revision or so behind the most recent release. so staroffice 5.2 > MIGHT not yet have a port, while 5.1 clearly does. i don't know simply > because i haven't checked the ports. it would obviously be easy enough to > do. i just haven't yet because i'm not sure what i want to do. My ports tree (updated nightly) puts the version at 5.1a. Rahul. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000628000848.H12860>