Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 12:47:17 -0700 From: Paul Saab <paul@mu.org> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files options src/sys/i386/conf NOT Message-ID: <20000628124717.A901@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20000628152251.Z18942@jade.chc-chimes.com>; from billf@chimesnet.com on Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 03:22:52PM -0400 References: <20000627091227.K275@fw.wintelcom.net> <200006271755.KAA01724@john.baldwin.cx> <20000628152251.Z18942@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Fumerola (billf@chimesnet.com) wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 10:55:03AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > Show me a browser that only issues 0.9 requests and I'll show you > > > a browser that wouldn't grok the html on my page even if it did > > > respond to 0.9. > > > > Your home page doesn't determine the standards for HTTP. :-P > > > > For one thing, if I manually telnet to a host, I'm much more likely > > to use a 0.9 request than a 1.0 one because it's fewer characters > > to type. Why would anyone use telnet? What if you want to test the > > web server on a machine over a remote login connection and don't > > have lynx or w3m installed for some reason or another? > > 'telnet foo 80\nGET /\n' is easy to type. > > Well then they don't get the super-sexy performance. Your loss. I dont see what the arguing is about. Just dont enable it if you dont *WANT* it or fix the accept filter to check for what HTTP request it is getting. -- Paul Saab Technical Yahoo paul@mu.org - ps@yahoo-inc.com - ps@freebsd.org Do You .. uhh .. Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000628124717.A901>