Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2000 12:12:58 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /sys hierarchy Message-ID: <20000701121258.A59770@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20000701132617.G62464@argon.gryphonsoft.com>; from andrews@technologist.com on Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 01:26:17PM -0400 References: <200007011501.LAA07097@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007011913430.93840-100000@ws-ilmar.ints.ru> <20000701132617.G62464@argon.gryphonsoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 01:26:17PM -0400, Will Andrews wrote: > On Sat, Jul 01, 2000 at 07:14:35PM +0400, Ilmar S. Habibulin wrote: > > Some order, i suppose. > > There is plenty of order in the current system. Feh. > Garrett Wollman suggested that you answer this question carefully, and > you have not done that, but provide a vague summary of your beliefs. Yes he did. Talk to various committers and you'll see that many have ideas where files should live. There have been long threads on this issue that got nowhere. The reason things are in such a messy state is when something new is brought in, or is changed suffiently much for a repo copy the person take the chance to put the files where *they* think they should live. Vs. where there would be consistency in the /sys tree. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000701121258.A59770>