Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2000 18:25:39 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> To: peter@netplex.com.au Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC extended asm experts please look at this Message-ID: <200007030125.SAA32541@vashon.polstra.com> In-Reply-To: <20000703003530.9B6AB1CD7@overcee.netplex.com.au> References: <20000703003530.9B6AB1CD7@overcee.netplex.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20000703003530.9B6AB1CD7@overcee.netplex.com.au>, Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> wrote: > If I change it to use a static inline function, it seems to work and > will generate identical code (with -O): Thanks! I'll give that a try in both places where I'm having this problem. > It appears to generate valid code without -O, but I am not 100% > sure. It is very inefficient without -O. OK, I'll look at the code closely and try to convince myself that it's correct. I don't care if it's inefficient without optimization. I'm just trying to avoid having to field problem reports from people who for some reason build world without optimization. (This is for the dynamic linker.) Thanks again for the help! John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007030125.SAA32541>