Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 09:30:13 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Kenjiro Cho <kjc@csl.sony.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /sys hierarchy Message-ID: <200007051630.JAA43542@john.baldwin.cx> In-Reply-To: <20000705184041K.kjc@csl.sony.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05-Jul-00 Kenjiro Cho wrote: > > John Baldwin wrote: >> Notes: >> - There has been one vote so far to ditch the whole net/ reorg, although >> other people have expressed support for it. > > What do you intend to do with the networking headers? > The socket API standards specify the socket related headers and their > paths. At least, "net" and "netinet" should not be moved. The headers will always be installed in the right place in /usr/include: Makefile's are editable. As far as kernel compiles, symlinks can be created in the work directory as one possible solution. For example, sys/compile/i386/GENERIC/netinet -> ../../../../net/inet. This would most likely result in netinet _not_ being split up. > -Kenjiro -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.cslab.vt.edu/~jobaldwi/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007051630.JAA43542>