Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2000 11:44:11 -0400 From: Chris Richards <crichard-freebsd@wso.williams.edu> To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Alterations to vops Message-ID: <20000707114411.A31035@wso.williams.edu> In-Reply-To: <20000707080934.I25571@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 08:09:34AM -0700 References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10007062327020.68909-100000@login-1.eunet.no> <200007070143.SAA96248@apollo.backplane.com> <20000706184859.C25571@fw.wintelcom.net> <20000706223150.A24949@klapaucius.zer0.org> <20000707080934.I25571@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 08:09:34AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > The only problem is that for the "average case" you waste nearly > 3.5k per directory cached, so it's only really a win on systems > with large amounts of ram. In your estimation, how large is "large"? Of course each site should test to see what best suits its needs, but I'm looking for a rough idea. -chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000707114411.A31035>