Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 17:54:24 +0200 From: Gabriel Ambuehl <gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch> To: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: which ostype for sendmail? Message-ID: <1525042038.20000716175424@buz.ch> In-Reply-To: <20000716202259.A1847@physics.iisc.ernet.in> References: <39709F70.BEE428D9@miltonstreet.com> <20000715202202.A48150@localhost.bsd.net.il> <3970BADD.F0737063@miltonstreet.com> <20000715230047.A838@localhost.bsd.net.il> <3971C8BF.EEA0F056@miltonstreet.com> <20000716202259.A1847@physics.iisc.ernet.in>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Rahul, Sunday, July 16, 2000, 4:52:59 PM, you wrote: > This isn't really an answer to your question, but I find qmail to be > much easier to configure for such things. And it's supposed to be > faster, more reliable and more secure. I can only agree. Qmail is blazingly fast. Setup is almost foolproof if you follow http://web.infoave.net/~dsill/lwq.html and together with Inter7's vpopmail (http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail) all virtualhosting needs I could imagine have been solved. (And despite the probably involved license problems): <blasphemy> When gets sendmail substituted through qmail right from the start? I mean you guys always want to be the fastest and most secure, so that's surely an option. </blasphemy> Best regards, Gabriel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1525042038.20000716175424>