Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 18:17:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openSSH 2.1 vs. 2.1.1 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007241813060.20680-100000@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200007240151.e6O1ptk09849@lerami.lerctr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> Is there a timeframe when openSSH 2.1.1 will be in the
> RELENG_4 tree as opposed to ports?
A few weeks, probably. I don't think there are any major fixes..
> There (apparently) is an issue with compatibility from
> 2.1.1p4 (on my UnixWare box), and the stock 2.1 (from RELENG_4 today).
..however, this sounds odd. There should not be any differences between
the port and the base system version other than the updated vendor code
(i.e. they have the same FreeBSD-specific changes), and it sounds bad on
the part of the OpenSSH guys if 2.1 is incompatible with 2.1.1. Can you
provide more details?
Kris
--
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
-- Charles Forsythe <forsythe@alum.mit.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0007241813060.20680-100000>