Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 02:51:43 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> Cc: asmai@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Diking out ports a.out support Message-ID: <20000809025143.C97174@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20000731081113.I735@FreeBSD.org>; from ade@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 08:11:13AM -0500 References: <200006230927.CAA23802@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000623080800.F77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <3953573F.7B95B83E@FreeBSD.org> <20000623094306.I44870@FreeBSD.org> <20000628221306.G31775@dragon.nuxi.com> <20000629103349.D31932@lovett.com> <20000701231144.A68949@mad> <20000701225008.C20888@FreeBSD.org> <20000701235931.C69938@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000731081113.I735@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 08:11:13AM -0500, Ade Lovett wrote:
> > I don't see why we can't pull PORTOBJFORMAT pending the 4.1-RELEASE.
> Now that 4.1-RELEASE is out of the door, and we have until
> around November until 4.2, can we get "official" go-ahead to
> kill a.out support from ports?
I still don't see why we need to do this. We already have the machanism
in place, so why not leave it?
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Disclaimer: Not speaking for FreeBSD, just expressing my own opinion.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000809025143.C97174>