Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2000 10:20:04 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@sunbay.com> To: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> Cc: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu>, Gregory Bond <gnb@itga.com.au>, net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: conf/20197: rc.firewall with firewall_type=simple doesn't work with natd Message-ID: <20000801102004.A753@sunbay.com> In-Reply-To: <20000731194233.A4370@mithrandr.moria.org>; from nbm@mithrandr.moria.org on Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 07:42:33PM %2B0200 References: <200007262240.PAA88875@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000731190439.A75240@sunbay.com> <20000731194233.A4370@mithrandr.moria.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 07:42:33PM +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > On Mon 2000-07-31 (19:04), Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > What do you guys think about the attached patch? > > I had something reasonably similar that I was going to suggest for > people who use custom rulesets and want natd_enable, but not for a > divert line to be added automatically (I use it on my little NAT > router). This means one less "customization" of rc scripts for me at > least (: > I am affraid I do not understand what do you mean here. Could you please explain it to me a bit more? The nat() function installs `divert' rule where appropriate only when both `natd_enable' and `natd_interface' are set in rc.conf. -- Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000801102004.A753>