Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 16:29:18 +0100 From: void <float@firedrake.org> To: Mitja Horvat <mitja.horvat@hermes.si> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.1-RELEASE problem writing to async mounted filesystem Message-ID: <20000809162918.A3293@firedrake.org> In-Reply-To: <200008091038.MAA03452@akira.hermes.si>; from mitja.horvat@hermes.si on Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:35:11PM %2B0200 References: <200008091038.MAA03452@akira.hermes.si>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 12:35:11PM +0200, Mitja Horvat wrote: > > As I understand SU, it's just a method to do metadata asynchronously in a > safe way, > so using noasync with SU does still have a point? "Using noasync" is a no-op; noasync is the default. -- Ben 220 go.ahead.make.my.day ESMTP Postfix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000809162918.A3293>